War and Peace

Audience Reviews

View More

Robert P @Superbad Sep 29, 2026 War and Peace = a *3* star Movie! See more Omar B @RT62891515 Sep 22, 2025 Never read the novel, but from an entertainment standpoint this was surprisingly enjoyable to watch. Massive sets with thousands of extras and intricate uniforms, grand battle scenes, and some good acting all around. Ferrer was decent but nothing special, Fonda did well despite being miscast, Audrey was the standout and is practically the reason to watch. The film is definitely long at 3hr30, and some scenes felt dragged out. But the visuals are a highlight and were impressive to watch. See more Milena I @RT93197048 Jan 1, 2025 Audrey’s movies are all extremely entertaining, but, her War and Peace is just wonderful. The acting is exceptional and this is one of my favorite of her movies. This truly deserves a higher review. See more Blu B @RT43513976 Oct 25, 2024 I've never read the novel so this is my first exposure to this epic material and it's not bad. It's half decently made all around. It's defintely trying to be a epic drama and war film that reminds me a lot of Doctor Zhivago but not as well done. The production value is good, the battle scenes are good, there are some epic shots in this, and Audrey Hepburn is great. That's the best things about this in a nutshell. That being said, Mel Ferrer is just alright and feels a bit wooden. Fonda isn't bad but I don't know it felt like he was almost miscast for this. Neither don't have any real special chemistry. Now I can tell you there probably is quite a bit of stuff cut from the novel because it does jump around at times between the stories of all 3 navigating through the Napolean's Conquest of Russia. And this feels VERY long. The third hour is defintely the best one though. The direction is pretty basic also and it feels like it doesn't always make the best use of it's assets to give an epic feeling. Like certain shots feel like they could be done better to convey a much better epic scope. This alternates between epic and intimate with mixed results. This kind of makes you feel the weight of that runtime. There isn't any intermissions in this so definetly take a couple breaks with this. It makes sense enough but I just really never felt that much emotional connection to any of the main trio for the reasons listed above. If your a big fan of the source material and a fan of any actors in this than maybe it's worth a shot with this. I am aware there are better adaptations than this. For a Western version it would be worth it to try and remake this. See more Jared D @RT74006010 Oct 19, 2020 This is a big production with big strengths and big flaws as well. If you are unfamiliar with Tolstoy's original, even at 3 and a half hours this film only hits the highlights. Strengths: the casting. Most of the cast are excellent. This is actually one of Audrey Hepburn's best dramatic performances. She captures the character of Natasha perfectly. The weaknesses: again, the casting. The exception to the previous point is Henry Fonda's role as Pierre. Fonda never finds the essence of this character. One of Fonda's strengths is his ability to play an American "everyman." Among this cast of Europeans telling an essentially European story, his Americanness stands out. He is simply not convincing playing a Russian aristocrat. I also think he was too old to play this young man who is only supposed to be 10 or so years older than Natasha. Rather than anchoring the scenes he is in with a compelling characterization, Pierre comes off as enigmatic and unreadable. Another weakness: the editing. The film easily could have had a 30 minutes or more chopped out of it and it would not have been missed. Still, overall, a movie worth seeing for the rest of the cast, a truly great story with many surprises. See more Steve D @RT35616104 Jul 21, 2020 Great adaptation with strong performances. See more Read all reviews

War and Peace

My Rating

Read More Read Less WRITE A REVIEW EDIT REVIEW POST RATING